Cruise News

Titanic vs Titanic II: How Different Would the New Ship Really Be?

The proposed Titanic II would look familiar but differ dramatically in size, propulsion, lifeboats and navigation. We compare the published plans with the 1912 original.

By Deck7 Editorial • Published 15 October 2026 at 18:30 • 3 min read
Share article X Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp Email

More than a century after RMS Titanic sank, Blue Star Line proposes a modern ship that recreates her famous appearance. But the engineering, safety systems and passenger experience would be very different. Titanic II has not been built.

Specifications compared

SpecificationTitanicTitanic II (proposed)
Length269.1 m269 m
Beam28.2 m32.2 m
Gross tonnage46,329 GRTapproximately 56,000 GT
Passengers2,435 design capacityup to 2,435 proposed
Funnelsfourfour proposed
Propulsioncoal-fired steamdiesel-based proposed
Lifeboats20; 1,178 placesmodern compliant arrangement not finalised

Almost identical in length — but wider

The original Titanic measured 269.1 metres long and 28.2 metres wide. Blue Star Line proposes Titanic II at 269 metres long and 32.2 metres wide. The proposed 56,000 GT is about 21% greater than Titanic’s 46,329 GRT, although these tonnage measures are not perfectly interchangeable.

Four funnels, different engines

The original used coal-fired steam machinery and three propellers. Blue Star Line proposes diesel propulsion for Titanic II while retaining the familiar four-funnel silhouette. The final machinery specification is not confirmed.

Grand interiors and three classes

Blue Star Line proposes recreations of historic public rooms and 835 cabins: 383 first-class, 201 second-class and 251 third-class. Modern fire, accessibility and other requirements would influence the finished design.

Lifeboats and passenger safety

Titanic carried 20 lifeboats with capacity for 1,178 people. Any new international passenger vessel would have to meet modern lifesaving and evacuation standards. Titanic II’s final approved arrangements have not been published.

Navigation and watertight design

Titanic II would use modern navigation and communications technology and would need to meet current subdivision and damage-stability requirements. No ship can responsibly be described as unsinkable.

A proposed Atlantic crossing

Blue Star Line proposed a Southampton-to-New York voyage inspired by the original route, but has not announced a bookable itinerary.

Has Titanic II been built?

As of October 2026, no shipyard, signed building contract, steel cutting or keel laying has been publicly confirmed. The advertised June 2027 maiden voyage is not achievable on the disclosed timeline.

The verdict

Titanic II would recreate the appearance and atmosphere of the original while relying on modern engineering and safety systems. For now, the decisive difference is that the original sailed and Titanic II remains a proposal.

Read our investigation into the delayed Titanic II project.

Frequently asked questions

Is Titanic II the same size as Titanic?

No. The proposed ship is approximately the same length but about four metres wider.

Will Titanic II have four funnels?

That is what Blue Star Line proposes, although it would not recreate the original coal-fired machinery.

Can I buy tickets for Titanic II?

No. Blue Star Line says tickets are not currently available.

Is Titanic II under construction?

No publicly verified construction milestones have been announced as of October 2026.

Will Titanic II be safer?

It would need to comply with applicable modern passenger-ship rules; safety cannot be assessed until its final design and certification exist.

Sources

  1. Blue Star Line — March 2024 specifications
  2. Royal Museums Greenwich — Titanic fact sheet
  3. Blue Star Line — FAQs
  4. Deck7 — Titanic II status
Have a different view?

Write a response.

Challenge the argument, add relevant evidence or explain how this issue affects people in practice. We welcome thoughtful, useful first-hand experience, practical detail or a fresh perspective.

Write for Deck7
Know this MP?

Have first-hand knowledge or experience?

Have you worked with Clive Palmer? Do you have direct experience of this issue, their work or their recent parliamentary record?

We are interested in informed perspectives, constructive criticism and accounts that help readers understand the subject more clearly.

Write an article about this topic

Related articles